A Robust Platform for the Molecular Design of Potent, Protease-Stable, Long-Acting GIP Analogues.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) is a 42-amino acid peptide hormone that regulates postprandial glucose levels. GIP binds to its cognate receptor, GIPR, and mediates metabolic physiology by improved insulin sensitivity, ß-cell proliferation, increased energy consumption, and stimulated glucagon secretion. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) catalyzes the rapid inactivation of GIP within 6 min in vivo. Here, we report a molecular platform for the design of GIP analogues that are refractory to DPP4 action and exhibit differential activation of the receptor, thus offering potentially hundreds of GIP-based compounds to fine-tune pharmacology. The lead compound from our studies, which harbored a combination of N-terminal alkylation and side-chain lipidation, was equipotent and retained full efficacy at GIPR as the native peptide, while being completely refractory toward DPP4, and was resistant to trypsin. The GIP analogue identified from these studies was further evaluated in vivo and is one of the longest-acting GIPR agonists to date.

The Road towards Triple Agonists: Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide and Glucagon Receptor - An Update.

Obesity is the fifth leading risk factor for global deaths with numbers continuing to increase worldwide. In the last 20 years, the emergence of pharmacological treatments for obesity based on gastrointestinal hormones has transformed the therapeutic landscape. The successful development of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, followed by the synergistic combined effect of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1 receptor agonists achieved remarkable weight loss and glycemic control in those with the diseases of obesity and type 2 diabetes. The multiple cardiometabolic benefits include improving glycemic control, lipid profiles, blood pressure, inflammation, and hepatic steatosis. The 2023 phase 2 double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating a GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptor triagonist (retatrutide) in patients with the disease of obesity reported 24.2% weight loss at 48 weeks with 12 mg retatrutide. This review evaluates the current available evidence for GLP-1 receptor agonists, dual GLP-1/GIP receptor co-agonists with a focus on GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptor triagonists and discusses the potential future benefits and research directions.

Pharmacological Advances in Incretin-Based Polyagonism: What We Know and What We Don't.

The prevalence of obesity continues to rise in both adolescents and adults, in parallel obesity is strongly associated with the increased incidence of type 2 diabetes, heart failure, certain types of cancer, and all-cause mortality. In relation to obesity, many pharmacological approaches of the past have tried and failed to combat the rising obesity epidemic, particularly due to insufficient efficacy or unacceptable side effects. However, while the history of antiobesity medication is plagued by failures and disappointments, we have witnessed over the last 10 years substantial progress, particularly in regard to biochemically optimized agonists at the receptor for glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1R) and unimolecular coagonists at the receptors for GLP-1 and the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). Although the GIP receptor:GLP-1R coagonists are being heralded as premier pharmacological tools for the treatment of obesity and diabetes, uncertainty remains as to why these drugs testify superiority over best-in-class GLP-1R monoagonists. Particularly with regard to GIP, there remains great uncertainty if and how GIP acts on systems metabolism and if the GIP system should be activated or inhibited to improve metabolic outcome in adjunct to GLP-1R agonism. In this review, we summarize recent advances in GLP-1- and GIP-based pharmacology and discuss recent findings and open questions related to how the GIP system affects systemic energy and glucose metabolism.

The dual incretin co-agonist tirzepatide increases both insulin secretion and glucose effectiveness in model experiments in mice.

Tirzepatide is a dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor co-agonist which is approved for glucose-lowering therapy in type 2 diabetes. Here, we explored its effects on beta cell function, insulin sensitivity and insulin-independent glucose elimination (glucose effectiveness) in normal mice. Anesthetized female C57/BL/6 J mice were injected intravenously with saline or glucose (0.125, 0.35 or 0.75 g/kg) with or without simultaneous administration of synthetic tirzepatide (3 nmol/kg). Samples were taken at 0, 1, 5, 10, 20 and 50 min. Glucose elimination rate was estimated by the percentage reduction in glucose from min 5 to min 20 (KG). The 50 min areas under the curve (AUC) for insulin and glucose were determined. Beta cell function was assessed as AUCinsulin divided by AUCglucose. Insulin sensitivity (SI) and glucose effectiveness (SG) were determined by minimal model analysis of the insulin and glucose data. Tirzepatide glucose-dependently reduced glucose levels and increased insulin levels. The slope for the regression of AUCinsulin versus AUCglucose was increased 7-fold by tirzepatide from 0.014 ± 0.004 with glucose only to 0.099 ± 0.016 (P < 0.001). SI was not affected by tirzepatide, whereas SG was increased by 78% (P < 0.001). The increase in SG contributed to an increase in KG by 74 ± 4% after glucose alone and by 67 ± 8% after glucose+ tirzepatide, whereas contribution by SI times AUCinsulin insulin (i.e., disposition index) was 26 ± 4% and 33 ± 8%, respectively. In conclusion, tirzepatide stimulates both insulin secretion and glucose effectiveness, with stimulation of glucose effectiveness being the prominent process to reduce glucose.

GIPR Agonism Enhances TZD-Induced Insulin Sensitivity in Obese IR Mice.

Recent studies have found that glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) agonism can enhance the metabolic efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment by promoting both weight-dependent and -independent improvements on systemic insulin sensitivity. These findings have prompted new investigations aimed at better understanding the broad metabolic benefit of GIPR activation. Herein, we determined whether GIPR agonism favorably influenced the pharmacologic efficacy of the insulin-sensitizing thiazolidinedione (TZD) rosiglitazone in obese insulin-resistant (IR) mice. Genetic and pharmacological approaches were used to examine the role of GIPR signaling on rosiglitazone-induced weight gain, hyperphagia, and glycemic control. RNA sequencing was conducted to uncover potential mechanisms by which GIPR activation influences energy balance and insulin sensitivity. In line with previous findings, treatment with rosiglitazone induced the mRNA expression of the GIPR in white and brown fat. However, obese GIPR-null mice dosed with rosiglitazone had equivalent weight gain to that of wild-type (WT) animals. Strikingly, chronic treatment of obese IR WT animals with a long-acting GIPR agonist prevented rosiglitazone-induced weight-gain and hyperphagia, and it enhanced the insulin-sensitivity effect of this TZD. The systemic insulin sensitization was accompanied by increased glucose disposal in brown adipose tissue, which was underlined by the recruitment of metabolic and thermogenic genes. These findings suggest that GIPR agonism can counter the negative consequences of rosiglitazone treatment on body weight and adiposity, while improving its insulin-sensitizing efficacy at the same time.

Continued Treatment With Tirzepatide for Maintenance of Weight Reduction in Adults With Obesity: The SURMOUNT-4 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The effect of continued treatment with tirzepatide on maintaining initial weight reduction is unknown. Objective: To assess the effect of tirzepatide, with diet and physical activity, on the maintenance of weight reduction. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3, randomized withdrawal clinical trial conducted at 70 sites in 4 countries with a 36-week, open-label tirzepatide lead-in period followed by a 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled period included adults with a body mass index greater than or equal to 30 or greater than or equal to 27 and a weight-related complication, excluding diabetes. Interventions: Participants (n = 783) enrolled in an open-label lead-in period received once-weekly subcutaneous maximum tolerated dose (10 or 15 mg) of tirzepatide for 36 weeks. At week 36, a total of 670 participants were randomized (1:1) to continue receiving tirzepatide (n = 335) or switch to placebo (n = 335) for 52 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the mean percent change in weight from week 36 (randomization) to week 88. Key secondary end points included the proportion of participants at week 88 who maintained at least 80% of the weight loss during the lead-in period. Results: Participants (n = 670; mean age, 48 years; 473 [71%] women; mean weight, 107.3 kg) who completed the 36-week lead-in period experienced a mean weight reduction of 20.9%. The mean percent weight change from week 36 to week 88 was -5.5% with tirzepatide vs 14.0% with placebo (difference, -19.4% [95% CI, -21.2% to -17.7%]; P < .001). Overall, 300 participants (89.5%) receiving tirzepatide at 88 weeks maintained at least 80% of the weight loss during the lead-in period compared with 16.6% receiving placebo (P < .001). The overall mean weight reduction from week 0 to 88 was 25.3% for tirzepatide and 9.9% for placebo. The most common adverse events were mostly mild to moderate gastrointestinal events, which occurred more commonly with tirzepatide vs placebo. Conclusions and Relevance: In participants with obesity or overweight, withdrawing tirzepatide led to substantial regain of lost weight, whereas continued treatment maintained and augmented initial weight reduction. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04660643.

A Review of Incretin Therapies Approved and in Late-Stage Development for Overweight and Obesity Management.

OBJECTIVE: To review clinical trial data for incretin therapies that are approved or in late-stage development for overweight or obesity management, along with clinical implications of these therapies and future directions. METHODS: We searched for clinical trials involving incretin therapies studied specifically for overweight or obesity management in ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed from registry inception through December 2023. RESULTS: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonism, alone and in combination with glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonism or glucagon agonism, leads to significant weight reduction in people with overweight or obesity. Newer incretin therapies have demonstrated weight reduction between 15% to 25%, far outpacing non-incretin therapies for weight management and achieving levels of weight loss that may prevent weight-related complications. However, the discontinuation of incretin therapies is associated with weight regain. The main side effects of incretin therapies are transient, mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal side effects - nausea, diarrhea, constipation, and vomiting - that commonly occur in the first 4 to 8 weeks of treatment. There is a rich late-stage pipeline of incretin therapies for weight management, consisting of oral GLP-1 receptor agonists, dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists, dual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonists, triple GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptor agonists, and combination therapies with nonincretin drugs. CONCLUSION: Newer incretin therapies for weight management have the potential to improve the treatment for overweight and obesity, the treatment and prevention of weight-related complications, and the individualization of weight management. Ensuring that these therapies are accessible - and that treatment with them is consistent and sustainable - is necessary to translate findings from trials into the real world.

Molecular basis of signal transduction mediated by the human GIPR splice variants.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) is a potential drug target for metabolic disorders. It works with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor and glucagon receptor in humans to maintain glucose homeostasis. Unlike the other two receptors, GIPR has at least 13 reported splice variants (SVs), more than half of which have sequence variations at either C or N terminus. To explore their roles in endogenous peptide-mediated GIPR signaling, we determined the cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of the two N terminus-altered SVs (referred as GIPR-202 and GIPR-209 in the Ensembl database, SV1 and SV2 here, respectively) and investigated the outcome of coexpressing each of them in question with GIPR in HEK293T cells with respect to ligand binding, receptor expression, cAMP (adenosine 3,5-cyclic monophosphate) accumulation, ß-arrestin recruitment, and cell surface localization. It was found that while both N terminus-altered SVs of GIPR neither bound to the hormone nor elicited signal transduction per se, they suppressed ligand binding and cAMP accumulation of GIPR. Meanwhile, SV1 reduced GIPR-mediated ß-arrestin 2 responses. The cryo-EM structures of SV1 and SV2 showed that they reorganized the extracellular halves of transmembrane helices 1, 6, and 7 and extracellular loops 2 and 3 to adopt a ligand-binding pocket-occupied conformation, thereby losing binding ability to the peptide. The results suggest a form of signal bias that is constitutive and ligand-independent, thus expanding our knowledge of biased signaling beyond pharmacological manipulation (i.e., ligand specific) as well as constitutive and ligand-independent (e.g., SV1 of the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor).

GLP-1 receptor agonism and GIP receptor antagonism induce substantial alterations in enteroendocrine and islet cell populations in obese high fat fed mice.

Effects of sustained activation of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptors (GLP-1R) as well as antagonism of receptors for glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) on intestinal morphology and related gut hormone populations have not been fully investigated. The present study assesses the impact of 21-days twice daily treatment with the GLP-1R agonist exendin-4 (Ex-4), or the GIP receptor (GIPR) antagonist mGIP(3-30), on these features in obese mice fed a high fat diet (HFD). HFD mice presented with reduced crypt depth when compared to normal diet (ND) controls, which was reversed by Ex-4 treatment. Both regimens lead to an enlargement of villi length in HFD mice. HFD mice had increased numbers of GIP and PYY positive ileal cells, with both treatment interventions reversing the effect on PYY positive cells, but only Ex-4 restoring GIP ileal cell populations to ND levels. Ex-4 and mGIP (3-30) marginally decreased GLP-1 villi immunoreactivity and countered the reduction of ileal GLP-1 content caused by HFD. As expected, HFD mice presented with elevated pancreatic islet area. Interestingly, mGIP(3-30), but not Ex-4, enhanced islet and beta-cell areas in HFD mice despite lack of effect of beta-cell turnover, whilst Ex-4 increased delta-cell area. Co-localisation of islet PYY or GLP-1 with glucagon was increased by Ex-4, whilst islet PYY co-immunoreactivity with somatostatin was enhanced by mGIP(3-30) treatment. These observations highlight potential new mechanisms linked to the metabolic benefits of GLP-1R agonism and GIPR antagonism in obesity.

Mechanisms of action of incretin receptor based dual- and tri-agonists in pancreatic islets.

Simultaneous activation of the incretin G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) via unimolecular dual-receptor agonists (UDRA) has emerged as a new therapeutic approach for type 2 diabetes. Recent studies also advocate triple agonism with molecules also capable of binding the glucagon receptor. In this scoping review, we discuss the cellular mechanisms of action (MOA) underlying the actions of these novel and therapeutically important classes of peptide receptor agonists. Clinical efficacy studies of several UDRAs have demonstrated favorable results both as monotherapies and when combined with approved hypoglycemics. Although the additive insulinotropic effects of dual glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide receptor (GIPR) agonism were anticipated based on the known actions of either glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) or glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) alone, the additional benefits from GCGR were largely unexpected. Whether additional synergistic or antagonistic interactions among these G-protein receptor signaling pathways arise from simultaneous stimulation is not known. The signaling pathways affected by dual- and tri-agonism require more trenchant investigation before a comprehensive understanding of the cellular MOA. This knowledge will be essential for understanding the chronic efficacy and safety of these treatments.

The importance of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor activation for the effects of tirzepatide.

Tirzepatide is a unimolecular co-agonist of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptors recently approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency. Tirzepatide treatment results in an unprecedented improvement of glycaemic control and lowering of body weight, but the contribution of the GIP receptor-activating component of tirzepatide to these effects is uncertain. In this review, we present the current knowledge about the physiological roles of the incretin hormones GLP-1 and GIP, their receptors, and previous results of co-targeting the two incretin hormone receptors in humans. We also analyse the molecular pharmacological, preclinical and clinical effects of tirzepatide to discuss the role of GIP receptor activation for the clinical effects of tirzepatide. Based on the available literature on the combination of GLP-1 and GIP receptor activation, tirzepatide does not seem to have a classical co-activating mode of action in humans. Rather, in vitro studies of the human GLP-1 and GIP receptors reveal a biased GLP-1 receptor activation profile and GIP receptor downregulation. Therefore, we propose three hypotheses for the mode of action of tirzepatide, which can be addressed in future, elaborate clinical trials.

The incretin co-agonist tirzepatide requires GIPR for hormone secretion from human islets.

The incretins glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) mediate insulin responses that are proportionate to nutrient intake to facilitate glucose tolerance1. The GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is an established drug target for the treatment of diabetes and obesity2, whereas the therapeutic potential of the GIP receptor (GIPR) is a subject of debate. Tirzepatide is an agonist at both the GIPR and GLP-1R and is a highly effective treatment for type 2 diabetes and obesity3,4. However, although tirzepatide activates GIPR in cell lines and mouse models, it is not clear whether or how dual agonism contributes to its therapeutic benefit. Islet beta cells express both the GLP-1R and the GIPR, and insulin secretion is an established mechanism by which incretin agonists improve glycemic control5. Here, we show that in mouse islets, tirzepatide stimulates insulin secretion predominantly through the GLP-1R, owing to reduced potency at the mouse GIPR. However, in human islets, antagonizing GIPR activity consistently decreases the insulin response to tirzepatide. Moreover, tirzepatide enhances glucagon secretion and somatostatin secretion in human islets. These data demonstrate that tirzepatide stimulates islet hormone secretion from human islets through both incretin receptors.

Design of novel therapeutics targeting the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) to aid weight loss.

INTRODUCTION: With obesity rates growing globally, there is a paramount need for new obesity pharmacotherapies to tackle this pandemic. AREAS COVERED: This review focuses on the design of therapeutics that target the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) to aid weight loss. The authors highlight the paradoxical observation that both GIPR agonism and antagonism appear to provide metabolic benefits when combined with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1 R) agonism. The therapeutic potential of compounds that target the GIPR alongside the GLP-1 R and the glucagon receptor are discussed, and the impressive clinical findings of such compounds are reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: In this area, the translation of pre-clinical findings to clinical studies appears to be particularly difficult. Well-designed physiological studies in man are required to answer the paradox highlighted above, and to support the safe future development of a combination of GLP-1 R/GIPR targeting therapies.

[GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonists: emerging therapies for obesity]. / Agonistes des récepteurs du GLP-1 et du GIP : des thérapies émergentes de l'obésité.

Obesity is a chronic and recurrent metabolic disease associated with serious complications and increased mortality. Bariatric surgery was until recently the only intervention that could lead to significant and sustained weight loss. A better understanding of the endocrine regulation of appetite has allowed the development of new treatments. GLP-1 analogues are already available and a dual treatment of GLP-1 analogue and GIP has recently shown even greater efficacy in terms of weight loss. We present a summary of the known mechanisms of action and clinical data that support the use of these molecules in the treatment of obesity.

L'obésité est une maladie métabolique chronique et récidivante associée à de graves complications et à une mortalité accrue. La chirurgie bariatrique était jusqu'à récemment la seule intervention permettant d'obtenir une perte de poids significative et son maintien. Une meilleure compréhension de la régulation endocrinienne de l'appétit a permis le développement de nouveaux traitements. Les analogues du GLP-1 sont déjà disponibles et une double activation des récepteurs du GLP-1 et du GIP (double agoniste) a récemment montré une efficacité encore plus importante en termes de perte pondérale. Nous proposons une synthèse des mécanismes d'action connus et des données cliniques qui soutiennent l'utilisation de ces molécules dans le traitement de l'obésité.

GLP-1/GIP analogs: potential impact in the landscape of obesity pharmacotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is recognized as a major healthcare challenge. Following years of slow progress in discovery of safe, effective therapies for weight management, recent approval of the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) mimetics, liraglutide and semaglutide, for obesity has generated considerable excitement. It is anticipated these agents will pave the way for application of tirzepatide, a highly effective glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR), GLP-1R co-agonist, recently approved for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. AREAS COVERED: Following promising weight loss in obese individuals in Phase III clinical trials, liraglutide and semaglutide were approved for weight management without diabetes. Tirzepatide has attained Fast Track designation for obesity management by the US Food and Drug Association. This narrative review summarizes experimental, preclinical, and clinical data for these agents and related GLP-1R/GIPR co-agonists, prioritizing clinical research published within the last 10 years where possible. EXPERT OPINION: GLP-1R mimetics are often discontinued within 24 months meaning long-term application of these agents in obesity is questioned. Combined GIPR/GLP-1R agonism appears to induce fewer side effects, indicating GLP-1R/GIPR co-agonists may be more suitable for enduring obesity management. After years of debate, this GIPR-biased GLP-1R/GIPR co-agonist highlights the therapeutic promise of including GIPR modulation for diabetes and obesity therapy.

Acarbose diminishes postprandial suppression of bone resorption in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: The alpha-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose is an antidiabetic drug delaying assimilation of carbohydrates and, thus, increasing the amount of carbohydrates in the distal parts of the intestines, which in turn increases circulating levels of the gut-derived incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). As GLP-1 may suppress bone resorption, acarbose has been proposed to potentiate meal-induced suppression of bone resorption. We investigated the effect of acarbose treatment on postprandial bone resorption in patients with type 2 diabetes and used the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin(9-39)NH2 to disclose contributory effect of acarbose-induced GLP-1 secretion. METHODS: In a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study, 15 participants with metformin-treated type 2 diabetes (2 women/13 men, age 71 (57-85 years), BMI 29.7 (23.6-34.6 kg/m2), HbA1c 48 (40-74 mmol/mol)/6.5 (5.8-11.6 %) (median and range)) were subjected to two 14-day treatment periods with acarbose and placebo, respectively, separated by a six-week wash-out period. At the end of each period, circulating bone formation and resorption markers were assessed during two randomised 4-h liquid mixed meal tests (MMT) with infusions of exendin(9-39)NH2 and saline, respectively. Glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) was also assessed. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, acarbose impaired the MMT-induced suppression of CTX as assessed by baseline-subtracted area under curve (P = 0.0037) and nadir of CTX (P = 0.0128). During acarbose treatment, exendin(9-39)NH2 infusion lowered nadir of CTX compared to saline (P = 0.0344). Neither parathyroid hormone or the bone formation marker procollagen 1 intact N-terminal propeptide were affected by acarbose or GLP-1 receptor antagonism. Acarbose treatment induced a greater postprandial GLP-2 response than placebo treatment (P = 0.0479) and exendin(9-39)NH2 infusion exacerbated this (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes, treatment with acarbose reduced postprandial suppression of bone resorption. Acarbose-induced GLP-1 secretion may contribute to this phenomenon as the impairment was partially reversed by GLP-1 receptor antagonism. Also, acarbose-induced reductions in other factors reducing bone resorption, e.g. glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, may contribute.

Human epicardial adipose tissue expresses glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, glucagon, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors as potential targets of pleiotropic therapies.

AIMS: Human epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) plays a crucial role in the development and progression of coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. Microscopically, EAT is composed of adipocytes, nerve tissues, inflammatory, stromovascular, and immune cells. Epicardial adipose tissue is a white adipose tissue, albeit it also has brown fat-like or beige fat-like features. No muscle fascia divides EAT and myocardium; this allows a direct interaction and crosstalk between the epicardial fat and the myocardium. Thus, it might be a therapeutic target for pharmaceutical compounds acting on G-protein-coupled receptors, such as those for glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), glucagon (GCG), and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), whose selective stimulation with innovative drugs has demonstrated beneficial cardiovascular effects. The precise mechanism of these novel drugs and their tissue and cellular target(s) need to be better understood. We evaluate whether human EAT expresses GIP, GCG, and GLP-1 receptors and whether their presence is related to EAT transcriptome. We also investigated protein expression and cell-type localization specifically for GIP receptor (GIPR) and glucagon receptor (GCGR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Epicardial adipose tissue samples were collected from 33 patients affected by cardiovascular diseases undergoing open heart surgery (90.9% males, age 67.2 ± 10.5 years mean ± SD). Microarray and immunohistochemistry analyses were performed. Microarray analysis showed that GIPR and GCGR messenger ribonucleic acids (mRNAs) are expressed in EAT, beyond confirming the previously found GLP-1 [3776 ± 1377 arbitrary unit (A.U.), 17.77 ± 14.91 A.U., and 3.41 ± 2.27 A.U., respectively]. The immunohistochemical analysis consistently indicates that GIPR and GCGR are expressed in EAT, mainly in macrophages, isolated, and in crown-like structures. In contrast, only some mature adipocytes of different sizes showed cytoplasmic immunostaining, similar to endothelial cells and pericytes in the capillaries and pre-capillary vascular structures. Notably, EAT GIPR is statistically associated with the low expression of genes involved in free fatty acid (FFA) oxidation and transport and those promoting FFA biosynthesis and adipogenesis (P < 0.01). Epicardial adipose tissue GCGR, in turn, is related to genes involved in FFA transport, mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation, and white-to-brown adipocyte differentiation, in addition to genes involved in the reduction of fatty acid biosynthesis and adipogenesis (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Having reported the expression of the GLP-1 receptor previously, here, we showed that GIPR and GCGR similarly present at mRNA and protein levels in human EAT, particularly in macrophages and partially adipocytes, suggesting these G-protein-coupled receptors as pharmacological targets on the ongoing innovative drugs, which seem cardiometabolically healthy well beyond their effects on glucose and body weight.

Human epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is a unique and multifunctional fat compartment of the heart. Microscopically, EAT is composed of adipocytes, nerve tissues, inflammatory, stromovascular, and immune cells. Epicardial adipose tissue is a white adipose tissue, albeit it also has brown fat-like or beige fat-like features. No muscle fascia divides EAT and myocardium; this allows a direct interaction and crosstalk between the epicardial fat and the myocardium. Due to its distinctive transcriptome and functional proximity to the heart, EAT can play a key role in the development and progression of coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. Clinically, EAT, given its rapid metabolism and simple measurability, can be considered a novel therapeutic target, owing to its responsiveness to drugs with pleiotropic and clear beneficial cardiovascular effects such as the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists.Human EAT is found to express the genes encoding the receptors of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR), glucagon receptor (GCGR), and GLP-1. The immunohistochemistry indicates that GIP and GCG receptor proteins are present in EAT samples. Epicardial adipose tissue GIPR is inversely associated with genes involved in free fatty acid (FFA) oxidation and transport and with genes promoting FFA biosynthesis and adipogenesis. Epicardial adipose tissue GCGR is correlated with genes promoting FFA transport and activation for mitochondrial beta-oxidation and white-to-brown adipocyte differentiation and with genes reducing FFA biosynthesis and adipogenesis.As the myocardium relies mostly on FFAs as fuel and is in direct contiguity with EAT, these findings may have a great importance for the modulation of the myocardial activity and performance. Given the emerging use and cardiovascular effects of GLP-1R agonists, dual GIPR/GLP-1R agonists, and GLP-1R/GIPR/GCGR triagonists, we believe that pharmacologically targeting and potentially modulating organ-specific fat depots through G-protein­coupled receptors may produce beneficial cardiovascular and metabolic effects.

Enhanced Endosomal Signaling and Desensitization of GLP-1R vs GIPR in Pancreatic Beta Cells.

The incretin receptors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR), are prime therapeutic targets for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. They are expressed in pancreatic beta cells where they potentiate insulin release in response to food intake. Despite GIP being the main incretin in healthy individuals, GLP-1R has been favored as a therapeutic target due to blunted GIPR responses in T2D patients and conflicting effects of GIPR agonists and antagonists in improving glucose tolerance and preventing weight gain. There is, however, a recently renewed interest in GIPR biology, following the realization that GIPR responses can be restored after an initial period of blood glucose normalization and the recent development of dual GLP-1R/GIPR agonists with superior capacity for controlling blood glucose levels and weight. The importance of GLP-1R trafficking and subcellular signaling in the control of receptor outputs is well established, but little is known about the pattern of spatiotemporal signaling from the GIPR in beta cells. Here, we have directly compared surface expression, trafficking, and signaling characteristics of both incretin receptors in pancreatic beta cells to identify potential differences that might underlie distinct pharmacological responses associated with each receptor. Our results indicate increased cell surface levels, internalization, degradation, and endosomal vs plasma membrane activity for the GLP-1R, while the GIPR is instead associated with increased plasma membrane recycling, reduced desensitization, and enhanced downstream signal amplification. These differences might have potential implications for the capacity of each incretin receptor to control beta cell function.

Standard procedures for blood withdrawal in conscious male rats induce stress and profoundly affect glucose tolerance and secretion of glucoregulatory hormones.

OBJECTIVE: A fundamental difference between physiological and pharmacological studies in rats and humans is that withdrawal of blood from conscious rats necessitates restraint which inevitably inflicts a higher level of stress. We investigated the impact of handling on acute glucose regulation and secretion of glucoregulatory hormones in rats. METHODS: Fasted male Sprague Dawley rats (375-400 g, n = 11) were given an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) by gavage (2 g/kg). Blood was sampled frequently until 90 min after challenge by handheld sampling (HS) or by automated sampling (AS). In the HS experiment, blood was withdrawn by restraint and sublingual vein puncture; two weeks later, samples were obtained by AS through an implanted catheter in a carotid artery, allowing sampling without disturbing the animals. RESULTS: On the day of HS, post challenge glucose AUCs were ∼17% higher (P < 0.0001), despite gastric emptying (AUC) being reduced by ∼30% (P < 0.0001). Plasma insulin AUC was 3.5-fold lower (P < 0.001), and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) AUC was reduced by ∼36% but glucagon-like peptide-1 concentrations were not affected. Glucagon concentrations were higher both before and after challenge (fold difference in AUCs = 3.3). Adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) and corticosterone AUCs were 2.4-fold and 3.6-fold higher (P < 0.001), respectively. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our study highlights that sampling of blood from conscious rats by sublingual vein puncture inflicts stress which reduces glucose absorption and glucose tolerance and blunts secretion of insulin and GIP. As blood sampling in humans are less stressful, standard procedures of conducting OGTT's in rats by HS presumably introduce an interspecies difference that may have negative consequences for translatability of test results.